PAPER

BLINK: Multimodal Large Language Models Can See but Not Perceive

Multimodal Intelligence Vision-Language Pre-training Other MMI CV Monocular or Binocular Depth Estimation and Occlusion Handling Deepfake Detection
我们推出了Blink,这是一个针对多模式语言模型(LLMs)的新基准,专注于其他评估中没有的核心视觉感知能力。Blink的大部分任务都可以在人类“眨眼间”内解决(例如,相对深度估计、视觉对应、取证检测和多视角推理)。然而,我们发现这些需要感知能力的任务对于当前的多模式LLMs来说存在重大挑战,因为它们无法通过自然语言进行调节。Blink将14个经典的计算机视觉任务重新格式化为3,807个多项选择题,配对单个或多个图像和视觉提示。虽然人类平均获得95.70%的准确率,但对于现有的多模式LLMs来说,Blink令人惊讶地具有挑战性:即使是表现最好的GPT-4V和Gemini也只能获得51.26%和45.72%的准确率,仅比随机猜测高13.17%和7.63%,这表明这种感知能力在最近的多模式LLMs中尚未“出现”。我们的分析还强调,专业的CV模型可以更好地解决这些问题,为未来的改进提供了潜在的途径。我们相信Blink将激发社区帮助多模式LLMs赶上人类水平的视觉感知。
We introduce Blink, a new benchmark for multimodal language models (LLMs) that focuses on core visual perception abilities not found in other evaluations. Most of the Blink tasks can be solved by humans "within a blink" (e.g., relative depth estimation, visual correspondence, forensics detection, and multi-view reasoning). However, we find these perception-demanding tasks cast significant challenges for current multimodal LLMs because they resist mediation through natural language. Blink reformats 14 classic computer vision tasks into 3,807 multiple-choice questions, paired with single or multiple images and visual prompting. While humans get 95.70% accuracy on average, Blink is surprisingly challenging for existing multimodal LLMs: even the best-performing GPT-4V and Gemini achieve accuracies of 51.26% and 45.72%, only 13.17% and 7.63% higher than random guessing, indicating that such perception abilities have not "emerged" yet in recent multimodal LLMs. Our analysis also highlights that specialist CV models could solve these problems much better, suggesting potential pathways for future improvements. We believe Blink will stimulate the community to help multimodal LLMs catch up with human-level visual perception.
许愿